Legal Opinion

State v. Cottingham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 29, 1953No. 16783PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

The appellants were convicted of grand larceny in the Court of General Sessions for Marlboro County in February 1952, and were thereupon sentenced. Their counsel served timely notice of appeal and on March 8, 1952, served exceptions and, quoting from the record, “a proposed statement of the case,” and requested extension of time for perfection of the appeal. This was acknowledged by the Solicitor who by letter to counsel required that the appeal record should conform to a transcript of the record of the trial; and he extended the time for ten days after receipt of the tran*183scrip…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rylee v. Marett, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Wade v. GoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Uzzell v. HornSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. Grollman v. LipsitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. COTTINGHAMSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API