Grollman v. Lipsitz
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Townsend, J., Beaufort, July, 1894. Motions to vacate attachments in eight cases against A. J. Lipsitz, the several plaintiffs being L. Grollman, M. Ferst’s Sons & Co., D. O’Neill & Son, Geo. W. Steffens & Son, Savannah Grocery Company, Savannah Steam Bakery Company, M. Hornik & Co., and Waterhouse & Danner.
Read the full summary
Before Townsend, J., Beaufort, July, 1894. Motions to vacate attachments in eight cases against A. J. Lipsitz, the several plaintiffs being L. Grollman, M. Ferst’s Sons & Co., D. O’Neill & Son, Geo. W. Steffens & Son, Savannah Grocery Company, Savannah Steam Bakery Company, M. Hornik & Co., and Waterhouse & Danner. The affidavit of L. Grollman was as follows: Personally appeared L. Grollman, who, being duly sworn, says: A. J. Lipsitz, defendant above named, has removed and disposed of his property with intent to defraud his creditors; that prior to the 10th day of March, 1894, said A. J.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gaby.
The above entitled causes, with one other in which no appeal has been taken, were brought in the Court of Common Pleas for Beaufort County, and attachments against defendant’s property were issued. The attachments were all issued upon an affidavit in each case, made by L. Grollman, which will be set forth iu the report of the cases. There was also in each case the affidavit as to cause of action. Thereafter, the defendant, upon affidavits, moved to vacate the attachments upon various grounds hereinafter mentioned. The plaintiffs…
2Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Solomons' EstateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. LangleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1906
- Williams v. HalfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Furness v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
- Sanders v. D. Landreth Seed Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.