Legal Opinion

State v. COTTINGHAM

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 29, 1953No. 16783Published

1Opinion of the Court

224 S.C. 181 (1953)

77 S.E.2d 897

STATE

v.

COTTINGHAM ET AL.

16783

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

September 29, 1953.

Mr. R.E. Hanna, of Cheraw, for Appellants.

Solicitor Robert L. Kilgo, of Darlington, for Respondent.

September 29, 1953.

STUKES, Justice.

The appellants were convicted of grand larceny in the Court of General Sessions for Marlboro County in February 1952, and were thereupon sentenced. Their counsel served timely notice of appeal and on March 8, 1952, served exceptions and, quoting from the record, "a proposed statement of the case," and requested extension of time for perfection of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rylee v. Marett, SheriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Wade v. GoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Uzzell v. HornSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. Grollman v. LipsitzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API