Legal Opinion

Margaretta Henderson and Bryant Williams, Jr. v. Tia Mitchell and Adonis Jackson

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided April 15, 2026No. 3:23-cv-01117Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MARGARETTA HENDERSON and ) BRYANT WILLIAMS, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 23-CV-1117-DWD vs. ) ) TIA MITCHELL and ADONIS ) JACKSON, ) Defendants. MEMORANDUM & ORDER DUGAN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court for the purpose of screening Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 26). Because Plaintiffs paid the full filing fee for this action, the complaint is not subject to screening under the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Nevertheless, the Court possesses inherent authority to screen…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API