Legal Opinion

Raymond v. McNeal

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Nooks District Court. The opinion states the material facts. Judgment for plaintiff MeNeal at the September Term, 1884. The defendants Na/ymond and Longley bring the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This was an action on a certain promissory note, which reads as follows:

“May 17,1879.— On or before the first day of September next, I promise to pay to Henry Eaymond, or bearer, the sum of two hundred dollars, for value received; to draw ten per cent, after date. Joseph Longley.

Henry Eaymond.”

In this form the note was received by J. P. McNeal, who was the owner and holder of the same at the commencement of this action. When the note became due it was not paid, and McNeal gave no notice at the time to Eaymond of its non-payment. Eaymond…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cook v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Partridge v. ColbyNew York Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lank v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API