Legal Opinion

Lank v. Morrison

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Graham District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This was an action on a promissory note, which reads as follows:

Ci$75. Whitfield, Kas., May 31, 1886.

“Ninety days after date we promise to pay to the order of R. A. McDanille seventy-five dollars, value received, with interest at 10 per cent, per annum, payable at Logan, Kansas.

Mrs. Fred Mahuron.

John S. Morrison.”

Said note is indorsed as follows, to wit: “R. A. McDanille, Jos. F. Sherer, F. M. Plart.”

Mrs. Fred. Mahuron executed the note as principal, and John S. Morrison signed the note as surety. The note was given for a patent right to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swartz v. RedfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Firman v. BloodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1864
  3. Withers v. BerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Raymond v. McNealSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amthauer v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API