Legal Opinion
Fox v. Brown
Mohegan Trial Court
Decided October 3, 2005No. CV-05-0114PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
JANE W. FREEMAN, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Defendants have moved to dismiss this action pursuant to Moh.R.P. § 20A(b) on the basis that it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Plaintiff brought this action against Mark Brown, Peter Schultz, Roland Harris, Shirley Walsh, Christine Murtha and Donald Morgan Chapman, in their capacities as Tribal Council Members (collectively “Council Members”) alleging that they violated certain provisions of the Constitution of the Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut (“Constitution”) and requesting that they be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Channing v. Seneca-Cayuga NationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2024