Legal Opinion
D'Ambra v. Maikshilo
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
Decided June 19, 2012No. GDTC-T-10-105-PMGPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GUERNSEY, C.J.
Following this Court’s ruling on Defendants’ first Motion for Summary Judgment, the Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint that named the Mohegan Tribe of Indians as a Defendant in Count One1. The Amended Complaint, however, maintained as Defendants the two individual Mohegan Tribal Police Officers as well as the Mohegan Tribal Police Department. The Defendants’ second Motion for Summary Judgment, now before the Court, seeks judgment based on three theories:
1. As to the individual Defendants (Counts Two,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Larobina v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Boucher Agency, Inc. v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut v. Big Bubba's BBQ, LLCMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2013