Barnebee v. Beckley
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kalamazoo. Bill for accounting. Complainants and defendant Beeldey appeal. An exception to a commissioner’s report after notice of irregularities in the proceeding before Mm, waiyes the irregularity, Tyler v. Simmons 6 Paige 127; Suydam v. Dequindre Walk.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Kalamazoo. Bill for accounting. Complainants and defendant Beeldey appeal. An exception to a commissioner’s report after notice of irregularities in the proceeding before Mm, waiyes the irregularity, Tyler v. Simmons 6 Paige 127; Suydam v. Dequindre Walk. Ch. 23; Ward v. Jewett id. 45; Emerson v. Atwater 12 Mich. 323; where exception is taken to an account which contains items of charges, he must specify the specific charges of which he complains, 2 Smith Ch. Pr. 372 ; 2 Dan. Ch. Pr. (4th Am. ed.) 1315, n. 4; Foster v. Goddard 1 Bl. 509; Deader v. Arnold 2 Sumn. 108; Holcomb v.…
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This is a bill for an accounting. The facts are complicated, but it will be sufficient for our purposes to state the following:
The co-partnership of H. Barnebee & Co., consisting of Eldridge Brown, Henry H. Bourn and Hosea Barnebee, was formed in the month of June, 1873, for the *615purpose of carrying on at Mendon, in St. Joseph county, the business of manufacturing sash, • doors, blinds and agricultural implements, the foundry business and the selling of lumber. In June, 1874, the co-partnership was dissolved and terminated by the mutual consent of the parties, and the assets were assigned to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Emerson v. AtwaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by5 opinions
- Whann v. DoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. District Court of Osage CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Bundy v. YoumansMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Loveland v. PeterMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Roelofs v. WeverMichigan Supreme Court · 1899