Legal Opinion

Roelofs v. Wever

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1899Published

Appeal from Ottawa; Padgbam, J. Bill by Hendrik J. Roelofs against John Wever and Alice Wever to restrain proceedings for an eviction, and for an accounting. There was a decree for complainant, and defendants filed a petition for a rehearing. From an order denying the petition, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

About March 1, 1895, complainant was the owner of, and resided upon, a farm of 60 acres of land. One Pycock held three mortgages upon the property, *335aggregating $2,438.39. A clay bank upon the farm made •it valuable for brick making, and a contract was made between complainant and the defendants (who are brother and sister) in substance as follows, viz. ■: The defendants were to pay the amount due upon the three mortgages, and receive a deed of the farm. They were to give back to the complainant a land contract, by which they were to agree to reconvey to the complainant at any time within five…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Detroit Savings Bank v. TruesdailMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Barnebee v. BeckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Sherwood v. Central Michigan Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API