Legal Opinion

Dunscombe v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 27, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

In 1926 Stuart Bank & Trust Company was closed by order of the Comptroller and later, in October of the same year, was permitted to reopen under a freezing agreement. The terms of that agreement were that 25% of the deposits of the bank on the date of closing would be made immediately available upon reopening; 50% was to be paid by the issuance of 5 certificates of deposit in the amount of 10% each, payable over a period of 15 months and the balance of the deposit written off as a liability of the bank. In order to satisfy the depositors the bank agreed to create a trust of certain securities…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sanderson's Administrators v. SandersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1880
  2. Glidden Admx. v. GuteliusSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. Fort Pierce Bank & Trust Co. v. SewallSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. Power v. AmosSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. Bloxham ex rel. Blount v. CraneSupreme Court of Florida · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frankel v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Dunscombe v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  3. West Coast Hospital Ass'n v. FLORIDA NATIONAL BK.Supreme Court of Florida · 1958
  4. Sewell v. Sewell Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1947
  5. Cooey v. CooeySupreme Court of Florida · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API