State v. Strong
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
This is a pretrial criminal appeal in a prosecution of defendant in district court for wilfully and intentionally taking contraband with him into the state prison in Still-water in violation of Minn.Stat. § 243.55 (Supp.1979). 1 The district court has denied the state’s motion pursuant to R. 17.04, R.Crim.P., to strike from the complaint as surplusage the words “wilfully” and “intentionally.” However, the court, with defendant’s consent, has certified the issue to this court as being important and doubtful. Rule 29.02, subd. 4, R.Crim.P. We affirm the order denying the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. SiirilaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BashWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Welfare of C.R.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. GonzalezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. NdikumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. AudetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.