Legal Opinion

State v. Siirila

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1971No. 42054PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*2Knutson, Chief Justice.

Defendant, after waiving jury trial in open court, was convicted of possession of a narcotic drug, Cannabis Sativa L., commonly known as marijuana, in violation of Minn. St. 1969, §§ 618.01, 618.02, and 618.21, subd. 1.

Section 618.02 reads:

“Except as authorized by this chapter it shall be unlawful for any person to sell, prescribe, administer, dispense or furnish to a minor, or manufacture, possess, have under his control, sell, prescribe, administer, dispense, or compound any narcotic drug.”

Cannabis Sativa L., which will be referred to hereinafter as marijuana, is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pelham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. State v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Schenher v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Edelin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. State v. HumphreysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In Re Welfare of C.R.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. State v. NdikumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API