State v. Siirila
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*2Knutson, Chief Justice.
Defendant, after waiving jury trial in open court, was convicted of possession of a narcotic drug, Cannabis Sativa L., commonly known as marijuana, in violation of Minn. St. 1969, §§ 618.01, 618.02, and 618.21, subd. 1.
Section 618.02 reads:
“Except as authorized by this chapter it shall be unlawful for any person to sell, prescribe, administer, dispense or furnish to a minor, or manufacture, possess, have under his control, sell, prescribe, administer, dispense, or compound any narcotic drug.”
Cannabis Sativa L., which will be referred to hereinafter as marijuana, is…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pelham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- State v. MorenoArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Schenher v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
- Edelin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- State v. HumphreysSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. MauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re Welfare of C.R.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. NdikumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.