Banks v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge.
This interlocutory appeal of a discovery sanction arises out of a suit brought by a former employee of the Office of the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms and Doorkeeper of the United States Senate (“SAA”) alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII. During discovery, the SAA repeatedly failed to timely produce a privilege log in response to numerous appropriate requests from the plaintiff and without court permission. A magistrate judge ordered the SAA to pay plaintiffs…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Shaw v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- United States v. ChoiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- In re Al-NashiriCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.