Legal Opinion

Banks v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 15, 2006No. 05-5322, 05-5323, 05-5324, 05-5335PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

GRIFFITH, Circuit Judge.

This interlocutory appeal of a discovery sanction arises out of a suit brought by a former employee of the Office of the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms and Doorkeeper of the United States Senate (“SAA”) alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII. During discovery, the SAA repeatedly failed to timely produce a privilege log in response to numerous appropriate requests from the plaintiff and without court permission. A magistrate judge ordered the SAA to pay plaintiffs…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. ChoiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. In re Al-NashiriCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  4. Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API