State v. Aschenbrenner
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Whitman county, Chadwick, J., entered March 13, 1906, upon a trial and conviction of the crime of rape.
1Per curiam
The appellant was convicted of rape on the person of a female child under the age of consent, and appeals from the judgment pronounced upon him.
The respondent moves to strike the statement of facts, because not filed and served within the time limited by statute. The record discloses that the statement was filed and served some thirty-seven days after the judgment was pronounced and the right of appeal accrued, and the record fails to show that the time for filing the statement was extended, or that any application to extend the time was made. In State v. Seaton, 26 Wash. 305, 66 Pac. 397,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SeatonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Crowley v. McDonoughWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Humes v. HillmanWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. LandesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michaelson v. OvermeyerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Russell v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- McDonald v. Van HoutenWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Williams v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1912