Legal Opinion
McBroom v. Ethicon Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided July 1, 2021No. 2:20-cv-02127Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 No. CV-20-02127-PHX-DGC Amanda McBroom, 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Ethicon, Inc.; and Johnson & Johnson, 13 Defendants. 14 15 This products liability action involves pelvic mesh devices made by Defendants 16 Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. Plaintiff Amanda McBroom received implants of 17 Defendants’ devices and claims they are defective and caused her serious injury. Plaintiff 18 filed suit in 2015 as part of a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) proceeding in West Virginia. 19 Doc. 1; see In re Ethicon,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.