Legal Opinion

Maresca v. Certosa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a shareholders’ derivative action, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosenzweig, J.), dated January 4, 1990, which granted the defendants’ motion to stay the action and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff and the defendant Marie La Certosa each own 50% of Petrolac Petroleum, Inc., of which the defendant John La Certosa is president and chief operating officer. A shareholders’ agreement executed by plaintiff and the defendant Marie La Certosa, and by the defendant John La Certosa…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nationwide General Insurance v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. GAF Corp. v. WernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. In re the Arbitration between Lane & Abel-BeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. In re the Arbitration between LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Henry v. Suffolk Home Distribution, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dazco Heating & Air Conditioning Corp. v. C.B.C. Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Marcus v. Millwork Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API