In re the Arbitration between Lane & Abel-Bey
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The individual parties to this litigation, being the holders of all of the outstanding shares of the corporate respondent, executed a stockholders’ agreement imposing restrictions on the disposition of their shares of corporate stock and making provisions with respect to the election of directors and the management of the corporation and as to the compensation to be paid to each of the shareholders as corporate employees. The agreement recited that thé corporation was a party, but it was never…
2Cited by17 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Matarasso & Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Coleman v. TaubCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Harris v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Vanderminden v. VandermindenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- GAF Corp. v. WernerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.