Marcus v. Millwork Trading Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered June 1, 1994, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to compel arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The issue of plaintiff’s status as a shareholder in defendant Millwork Trading Co. (see, Blatt v Socket, 199 AD2d 451), and plaintiff’s derivative claim against defendant Darling (see, Maresca v La Certosa, 172 AD2d 725), both fall within the scope of the broad arbitration clause contained in the shareholders’ agreement. The action was also properly stayed against defendant Fung since plaintiff’s claims against…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. V&R Advertising, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Brown v. v & R Advertising, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Blatt v. SochetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Maresca v. CertosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Castellone v. JP Morgan Chase BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Cohen v. Ark Asset Holdings, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000