Legal Opinion

Muller v. National Transportation Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is a motion by the defendant in a negligence action for an order directing that the action abate in that the plaintiff has died since its commencement (Civ. Prac. Act, § 88) or in the alternative that the complaint be dismissed for failure diligently to prosecute (Bules Civ. Prac., rule 156). *801As to the alternative branch of the motion, it cannot be said that there has been any neglect to prosecute. Indeed, in view of the demise of the plaintiff, no procedures may properly be invoked in the prosecution or defense of the cause except to obtain, upon due application, a substitution of an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matarrese v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  4. Holder v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hannes v. KleinmanNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Haeseler v. American Gas & Chemicals, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Pitti v. WarshawNew York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API