Legal Opinion

Holder v. New York City Transit Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The plaintiffs are wife and husband. The wife was accidentally hurt, allegedly because of the fault of the defendant. She and her husband engaged an attorney on a contingency basis to represent them in the prosecution of their claims against the defendant, and the usual negligence action was instituted — one cause of action for the wife to recover for her personal injuries, and another count in the same complaint 'for the husband to recover for the expense incurred by him in the medical care accorded the wife and for damages for loss of the wife’s services and society resulting from her…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of KrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Goldman v. Rafel Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Matarrese v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gary v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gonzales v. HegnerNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Myers v. MyersNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Muller v. National Transportation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API