Legal Opinion

Hannes v. Kleinman

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is an action in slander. Judgment was entered in plaintiff’s favor as by default. Defendant moved to vacate the judgment on the ground of nonservice of the summons. I referred the matter to an Official Referee to take testimony on the issue of fact and to report with his recommendations, holding determination of the motion in abeyance pending the coming in of such report. In his report, the Referee, after outlining the proof adduced before him, stated that “ on the basis of the credible testimony ” he found for the defendant. The minutes of the hearing were “ waived ” before the Referee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Friedlander v. Roxy Theatre, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Angelo v. AngeloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Muller v. National Transportation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API