Legal Opinion

FB & D., INC. v. Nathan Alterman Electric Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 7, 1965No. 14396PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADENA, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment rendered against appellants, F. B. & D., Inc., a corporation, Alvin Frieden, and Lois Leah Pullen, a feme sole, defendants below. The judgment allowed plaintiff, Nathan Alternan Electric Company, a corporation, recovery on two promissory notes, totalling $130,000.00, executed by defendants on January 3, 1963, together with interest in the sum of $24,239.57, and an award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $23,136.10.

In their original answer defendants alleged, among other things not material to this appeal, that the notes in question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adleson v. B. F. Dittmar Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ware v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  3. National Bond & Investment Co. v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Smith v. StevensTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Roberts v. CoffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Transamerican Leasing Co. v. Three Bears, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sapphire Homes, Inc. v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Commerce Savings Ass'n of Brazoria County v. GGE Management Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Sturm v. Muens, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007
  5. Finger Furniture Co. v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API