Legal Opinion

(2007)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided June 14, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear John R. Leopold

Your predecessor requested our opinion concerning disclosure of "mug shots" in the possession of the Anne Arundel County Police Department — i.e., booking photographs of individuals who have been arrested by the police department. In particular, must the police department disclose a mug shot in response to a request under the Public Information Act? Or do the laws governing "criminal history record information" preclude the police department from disclosing the photograph?

In our opinion, a mug shot in the possession of a police department is not subject to the restrictions…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pemberton v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Downs v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  5. Straughn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API