Legal Opinion

Straughn v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 7, 1983No. [No. 21, September Term, 1983.]PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting appellant’s "mug shot” as substantive evidence of an extrajudicial photographic identification.

I

On August 23, 1981, Thomas Saunders, a special police officer with the Giant Food Corporation, was inspecting the rear of a Giant store when he noticed a broken window at the adjacent Market Tire Company store. He observed an automobile drive into the parking lot. The driver got out of the car and went into a phone booth. At this point, Saunders was able to see the man’s face from a distance of about three feet.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  3. Robert E. Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Charles A. HarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. Cross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. State v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API