Legal Opinion

State v. Beliveau

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 29, 1994No. 12390PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (l)1 and sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (1) (A).2 On appeal, the defendant asserts that the trial court improperly (1) restricted his cross-examination of various witnesses by refusing to permit him to question them concerning portions of the victim’s statement to the police, thereby violating his constitutional right to *230confrontation, (2) permitted the use of hearsay evidence…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  2. Glucksman v. WaltersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. State v. SpiegelmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. State v. MoyeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. State v. YurchConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API