Legal Opinion

Hill v. Thorne

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 9, 1993No. 380PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Jeffrey Hill appeals an order dismissing his complaint against attorney Ralph Thorne. The trial court dismissed the complaint for Hill’s failure “to conform to the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure.” In examining the trial court’s rather summary opinion accompanying the above order, we have some difficulty determining exactly how Hill failed to conform to the rules. The trial court does refer us to an opinion in a different action by Hill, in which that court more thoroughly set forth its reasons for dismissing the action. See Hill v. Holland, et al., 414 Pa.Super. 675,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Blackwell v. Com. State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Sharp v. Valley Forge Medical Center & Heart Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. McCormick v. Northeastern BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Ibn-Sadiika v. RiesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bell v. Mayview State HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Ocasio v. Prison Health ServicesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Williams v. SyedCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Byoung Suk an v. Victoria Fire & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Weaver v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API