Legal Opinion
Thornton v. Empire Bank
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 24, 1997No. 21807PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
This proceeding was initiated pursuant to Section 362.730, RSMo 1994, whereby “[w]ithin sixty days after the taking effect of the merger or consolidation,” a “dissenting stockholder” of a bank or trust company may seek an evaluation of the value of his stock and be paid that by “the receiving bank or trust company” upon surrender of his stock. See Section 362.750, RSMo 1994.
Petitioner owned 982 shares of stock of Webster County Bank. Respondent-Appellant and Webster County Bank merged, effective November 18, 1995. Following the filing of his petition, Petitioner’s stock was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. City of Kansas City v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Green v. WoodardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Richard v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Boggs v. Farmers State Bank of Texas CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Klinedinst v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cook v. CookMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Hart v. Kupper Parker Communications, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Neosho R-V School District v. McGeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Excelsior Springs v. Elms Redevelopment Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999