City of Excelsior Springs v. Elms Redevelopment Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SPINDEN, Judge.
Nine members of a class of more than 850 persons who bought a right to stay at the Elms Hotel in Excelsior Springs for one to two weeks a year appeal the circuit court’s decision to deny their motion to set aside its judgment in a condemnation action. The appellants contend that the judgment was void because only nine members of their class received individual notice of the proceedings and because those individuals did not represent adequately their interests. We handed down an opinion on October 20,1998, reversing the circuit court’s judgment, but we granted the motion of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State Ex Inf. Ashcroft v. Kansas City Firefighters Local No. 42Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Millhouse v. Drainage District No. 48 of Dunklin CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Excelsior Springs v. Elms Redevelopment Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- City of Excelsior Springs v. Elms Redevelopment Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000