Ham Turpentine Co. v. Mizell

This is an action by the members of the firm of Ham Turpentine Company against the firm" Douglas & Mizell for damages for breach of a contract, and for the agreed price under the contract for 8,093 gallons of turpentine, delivered by the plaintiff to defendant^ and upon account.

• The defendants pleaded general issue, tender, and, in short, by consent general issue with leave, etc. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants on the plea of tender, and from a judgment thereon against the plaintiffs this appeal is prosecuted by them.

This is the second appeal in this case. The first is…