Legal Opinion

Brenard Mfg. Co. v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1923No. 7 Div. 415PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The individuals composing the partnership of the Brenard Manufacturing Company sue J. R. Sullivan on six promissory notes, given i)y him to them; five of the notes are for $80 each, and one is for the sum of $22. There was judgment for defendant, based on a verdict of the jury in his favor, and from it this appeal is prosecuted.

The court overruled demurrers of plaintiff to plea 5-A of defendant. This plea alleges the consideration for the notes wholly failed, that they were given for the purchase of three talking machines to be delivered at a future date. The machines were shipped to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Starr Jobbing House v. May Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Johnson v. CardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Leder Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hamilton Furniture Co. v. Brenard Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Brenard Mfg. Co. v. SullivanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Ham Turpentine Co. v. MizellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Brenard Mfg. Co. v. SullivanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Security Mutual Finance Corp. v. WalkerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API