Douglas & Mizell v. Ham Turpentine Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The Ham Turpentine Company entered into a contract in writing with the firm of Douglas & Mizell, stipulating for the sale of products of naval stores, consisting of approximately 300 barrels of turpentine and 1,000 barrels of rosin, at Elba, Ala., between July 1, 1920, and March 31, 1921. The Ham Turpentine Company brought this suit for a breach of this contract, and from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendants have prosecuted this appeal. The contract appears in the report of the case, but attention is necessarily here directed to some of its salient features.
The products were…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stoops v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Barlow v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
- Keller v. WebbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Chicago Auditorium Ass'n v. Corporation of the Fine Arts BuildingIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Wolfe v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Bell v. Birmingham Broadcasting CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- United States Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Mall Gift Cards, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.