Legal Opinion
Henry J. Kaufman & Associates, Inc. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 1986No. 85-237PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
In the case before us, the Department of Employment Services affirmed a decision by an appeals examiner holding that a claimant for unemployment compensation was qualified for benefits because the termination of her employment was not due to misconduct within the meaning of D.C. Code § 46-lll(b) (1984 Supp.). The employer has filed a petition for review, contending that the record clearly established misconduct, consisting of such behavior as chronic tardiness, refusal to cooperate with co-workers, and falsification of records. An examination of the transcript, however, impels us to hold that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Neer v. District of Columbia Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bowen v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ivey v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- McLean v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Smithsonian Institution v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- McLean v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986