Legal Opinion
United States v. Pimental
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 3, 2001No. Crim. No. 99-10310-NGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*224 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
GERTNER, District Judge.
On February 20, 2001, I ruled that the government had violated Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e) (“Rule 6(e)”) when it disclosed secret grand jury materials to private investigators from the Massachusetts Insurance Fraud Bureau (“the IFB”) in connection with the investigation of the defendants, Arthur L. Pimental and Loretta R. Pimental, (“the Pimentals”). United States v. Pimental, 199 F.R.D. 28 (D.Mass.2001) (“Pimental I”).
On April 3, 2001, I addressed the government’s motion to reconsider that decision. I spelled out in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. PimentalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. PimentalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- United States v. BonaventuraDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003