Legal Opinion

United States v. Pimental

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 19, 2002No. Crim. 99-10310-NGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GERTNER, District Judge.

This case arises from one of several prosecutions brought in this district by the United States Attorney’s Office at the behest of the Insurance Fraud Board of Massachusetts (“IFB”), a state-chartered but privately maintained organization created to investigate and police insurance fraud.

In this instance the IFB and U.S. Attorneys have focused on husband and wife Arthur and Loretta Pimental, who own and maintain a small, some might say a “mom-and-pop” construction business, for mail fraud. The indictment alleges that the Pimentals conspired to and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. PimentalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. RigasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API