United States v. Pimental
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GERTNER, District Judge.
This case arises from one of several prosecutions brought in this district by the United States Attorney’s Office at the behest of the Insurance Fraud Board of Massachusetts (“IFB”), a state-chartered but privately maintained organization created to investigate and police insurance fraud.
In this instance the IFB and U.S. Attorneys have focused on husband and wife Arthur and Loretta Pimental, who own and maintain a small, some might say a “mom-and-pop” construction business, for mail fraud. The indictment alleges that the Pimentals conspired to and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. PimentalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. RigasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003