Legal Opinion

7-Up Bottling Co. of Jasper Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 1, 1999No. 98-15344PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether purchasers were able to establish that a citric acid manufacturer conspired with competitors to fix prices and to allocate market share in violation of the federal antitrust laws.

I

Citric acid is a corn derivative with a wide variety of uses in the manufacture of food, soft drinks, detergents, and pharmaceuticals. Varni Brothers Corp. and 7-Up Bottling Company of Philadelphia, Inc. (collectively “Varni”) filed civil antitrust class actions against Cargill, Incorporated (“Cargill”), Archer Daniels Midland (“ADM”), Haarman & Reimer (“H&R”),…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re: Citric Acid Litigation 7-Up Bottling Co.Of Jasper Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Bryant v. ArmstrongDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API