Legal Opinion

Bruel v. Liggett & Meyers Tobacco Compact

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from McLennan. Tried below before Hon. Marshall Surratt.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

This case is a consolidated one of three suits for the trial of right of property. The appellees in the three suits had executions issued upon judgments obtained by them in each of their •suits against the defendant H. E. Bruel, which were levied upon the property in controversy. The three suits so consolidated were for the trial of the right to that property. The property in dispute was a stock of goods, a lot of furniture and fixtures, and a soda fountain, levied upon as the property of R. C. Bruel, the husband of the claimant, Mrs. iST. E. Bruel, who when the levies…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. v. VogelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Byrd Irr. Co. v. SmythCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Hines v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. AbercrombieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Byrd Irr. Co. v. SmythCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API