Legal Opinion

Byrd Irr. Co. v. Smyth

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 2, 1913PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Uvalde County. Action by the Byrd Irrigation Company against J. G. Smyth. From a judgment awarding damages for the condemnation of certain land for an irrigation project, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action by the Byrd Irrigation Company, a corporation, to condemn a tract of land in Uvalde county belonging to J. G. Smyth, appellee, for the purpose of constructing dams, reservoirs, and canals to be used for irrigation purposes under the powers conferred upon it by its charter under chapter 2, title 60, of the Revised Statutes. A commission was appointed by the county court, in accordance with the law, to fix the amount of land and assess the damages. Report was duly made by the commission, and from that report appeal was taken to the county court. The case was there tried…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Trinity & Sabine Railway Co. v. SchofieldTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. FaganTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Chicago & Evanston Railroad v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Cooper v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  5. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. RubyTexas Supreme Court · 1891

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rogers v. LancasterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. KezerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. BeckworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Foster v. BurginCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Central State Bank of Coleman v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API