Legal Opinion
In Re Micheel
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 1992No. 90-SP-1363Published
1Opinion of the Court
610 A.2d 231 (1992)
In re Richard A. MICHEEL, Respondent.
A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
No. 90-SP-1363.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued June 26, 1991.
Decided May 19, 1992.
Elizabeth A. Herman, Asst. Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, the Office of Bar Counsel. Frederick B. Abramson, Bar Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Samuel McClendon, Asst. Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C., at the time the brief was filed, were on the brief, for petitioner.
R. Kenneth Mundy, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before FERREN, TERRY and SCHWELB,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.