Legal Opinion

Pettineo v. City of Philadelphia Law Department-Claims Division

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 4, 1998No. 2421 C.D. 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, Senior Judge.

Paul Pettineo appeals an order of the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court granting the City of Philadelphia’s (City) post-trial motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and entering judgment in favor of the City.

The facts in this ease are not in dispute. On January 1, 1994, City police officers tied yellow nylon ropes between trees and signposts on Broad Street in the City to prevent pedestrians and cars from crossing the street during the 1994 Mummer’s Day Parade. At approximately 6:00 a.m., Pettineo, responding to his car alarm and seeing that his vehicle was about to be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Wilson v. Ridgway Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Slough v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Krevitz v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Beardsley v. State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Glenn v. HoranCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Coleman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Export Boxing & Crating Inc. v. Tech Met, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2003
  5. J.L. Camacho v. West Chester Area SDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API