Legal Opinion

Riley v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1946No. 29358. Judgment reversed; award set asidePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Defendant in error, William A. Riley, filed an application for adjustment of claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, alleging certain injuries as arising out of and in the course of his employment with plaintiff in error company. The. injury complained of was that he had been shot by another employee of plaintiff in error.

The matter was referred to an arbitrator who awarded compensation. On review before the Industrial Commission the arbitrator’s decision was set aside with the finding that Riley did not sustain accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment and so…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Ohio Building Safety Vault Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Kensington Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Vincennes Bridge Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Triangle Auto Painting & Trimming Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Armour & Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Container Corp. of America v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Moss Equipment v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API