Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1947No. 30042. Judgment reversed; award set asidePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Defendant in error, James H. Pleasant, filed application for adjustment under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, alleging injuries received in the course of his employment with Armour & Company, the plaintiff in error, resulting in the loss of his right eye. On hearing, the arbitrator denied the application on the ground that the claimant did not sustain accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. On review, the Industrial Commission set aside the arbitrator’s decision and entered an award, which the circuit court of Cook county confirmed. The cause is here on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scholl v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City of Chicago v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Vincennes Bridge Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Triangle Auto Painting & Trimming Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Franklin Coal & Coke Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dillon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Fischer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Jefferson Ice Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Myszkowski v. Wilson & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API