Legal Opinion
Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. Robinson
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 31, 1936No. 13308PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.
Henry Robinson was an employee of the Austin Bridge Company, who was a subscriber within the terms of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St. art. 8306 et seq.), carrying a policy of insurance prescribed by that act, and this appeal is by the insurance company from a judgment of the district court of Tarrant county for the sum of $4,058.36 as a lump sum settlement of compensation for injuries alleged to have been sustained by Robinson in the course of his employment.
Robinson presented his claim for compensation for his injuries to the Industrial Accident…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Southern Surety Co. v. Nalle & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Travelers' Ins. Co. v. PetersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Southern Casualty Co. v. FulkersonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Booth v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. RobinsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
- Commercial Standard Insurance v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Robinson v. Commercial Standard InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.