Legal Opinion
United States v. Brown
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 4, 1976No. Cr. 5-76-10PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILES W. LORD, District Judge.
I. Introduction and Facts
From a judgment of conviction by a United States Magistrate, * Carl E. Brown has taken a timely appeal to this Court. Rule 8(a) Fed.R.P. for the Trial of Minor Offenses Before United States Magistrates. The review by this Court is the same as an appeal from a judgment of a district court to a court of appeals. Rule 8(d), supra.
Because this is a case testing the jurisdiction of the United States to exercise its authority over the water areas within the boundaries of Voyageurs National Park, there is no dispute…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kleppe v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Collins v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Ass'n of Property Owners v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1980
- United States v. FautanuDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1990
- United States v. LittleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1986
- Voyageurs National Park Ass'n Defenders of Wildlife v. ArnettDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Opinion No. (1981), Nebraska Attorney General Reports1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.