Legal Opinion

United States v. Fautanu

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided August 1, 1990No. 90-00791 ACKPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO MAGISTRATE FOR CORRECTION OF PARTIALLY DEFECTIVE SENTENCE

KAY, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

On November 28, 1989, Defendant Fau-tanu was cited as the registered owner of a motor vehicle being driven without no-fault insurance coverage in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 431:100-104. At the time, the motor vehicle was being driven on the Aliamanu Military Reservation. Because the violation occurred on a federal military reservation, HRS § 431:100-104 qualifies in the instant case as a federal offense pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 13, the Assimilative Crimes Act.

On…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Busic v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ManciaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  2. Pooley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
  3. Pooley v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API