Legal Opinion
Voyageurs National Park Ass'n Defenders of Wildlife v. Arnett
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 6, 1985No. Civ. No. 3-84-261PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*533MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RENNER, District Judge.
Before the Court are 1) plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on Count I of the Complaint; 2) defendant Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim for relief; and 3) defendants G. Ray Arnett and the Department of Interior’s motion for summary judgment. The Court, having accepted affidavits and exhibits on these matters, will treat all the motions as requesting summary judgment.
FACTS
Plaintiffs are nine environmental organizations challenging the federal approval of a state wildlife…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kosak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Weber Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Housing Authority of the City of Omaha, Nebraska v. United States Housing Authority, Etc., and National Tenants OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- United States v. KnauerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- VOYAGEURS NAT. PARK ASS'N v. ArnettDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985