Legal Opinion
Post & Taback, Inc. v. Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 11, 2005No. 04-1128PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
This cause was considered on the record compiled before the Secretary of Agriculture and on the briefs of the parties. It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be DENIED for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
MEMORANDUM
Post & Taback petitions for review of the Secretary of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- H.C. MacClaren, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kleiman & Hochberg, Inc. v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007