Legal Opinion
Kleiman & Hochberg, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 14, 2007No. 06-1283PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
The petitioners in this case are Kleiman & Hochberg, Inc., a wholesale produce merchant, and its president, Michael Hirsch. The company’s vice president pled guilty to bribing a federal produce inspector and later admitted that he had been making similar payments for more than a decade. After an administrative enforcement proceeding, the Secretary of Agriculture revoked the company’s license to do business under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act. The same administrative decision triggered restrictions on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Joseph E.L. Sullivan v. David R. Freeman and James C. DelworthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Hawkins v. Agricultural Marketing Service, Department of Agriculture, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Affum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Taylor v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- B.T. Produce Co. v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Beucke v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Beucke v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.