Riley v. State

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol and appeals.

1. Appellant’s first two enumerations of error relate to the admissibility of the results of a field “breath” test. Appellant contends such evidence was not admissible because the device used was not approved by the Division of Forensic Sciences for the purpose of obtaining admissible evidence at trial, and the State did not lay a proper foundation for admission of such evidence.

The “results” of the field test objected to at trial did not relate to the amount of alcohol content in appellant’s blood,…