Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Bessemer City Mining Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Upon motion of appellant to reinstate the appeal.

1Per curiam

For the reasons given in the opinion dismissing the appeal, the motion to reinstate is denied. Every exception in the case is based upon the judgment, and that not being printed the case when reached was not in a plight to be intelligently argued (Avery v. Pritchard, 106 N. C., 344,) and the Court was compelled either to continue the cause or dismiss it. The appellee, having made the motion in writing to dismiss, was entitled to have it allowed. The requirement as to printing the parts of the record, which are essential to be considered on appeal, is a necessity demonstrated by the experience…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Stephens v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Avery v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Whitehurst v. . PettipherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Dunn v. . UnderwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Carstarphen.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Carter v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API